[BiO BB] Fish genomics
Ryan Golhar
golharam at umdnj.edu
Tue May 9 11:14:54 EDT 2006
You should read the papers that publish the genomes for these different
species.
They mention the reason behind sequencing their genome. I remember from
the fugu paper - Fugu is a distant cousin of humans and has a very
compact genome, about 1/8 in size. As such, it lacks a lot of "junk
dna" aka introns and intergenic regions leaving it genome mostly
functional. It should help in determining what is functional in human
versus what is non-functional.
Also, look at the website that make the genomes available - NCBI, UCSC,
Ensemble, etc. If you read their "About" pages, you should get more
information...
Ryan
-----Original Message-----
From: bio_bulletin_board-bounces+golharam=umdnj.edu at bioinformatics.org
[mailto:bio_bulletin_board-bounces+golharam=umdnj.edu at bioinformatics.org
] On Behalf Of Nagesh Chakka
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 3:37 AM
To: bio_bulletin_board at bioinformatics.org
Subject: [BiO BB] Fish genomics
Hi All,
I just started work with fish genomes for my comparative study. I am a
bit puzzled as to why three different fish species were selected for
sequencing (Danio rerio </Danio_rerio/>, Fugu rubripes,
</Fugu_rubripes/>and Tetraodon nigroviridis). Is there is any advantage
in each of these species selected for sequencing which is not there in
the other? I am addressing this question to this forum as I have a
feeling that someone out there may be working with fish genome and may
be having extensive information about what I was looking for. Please
also note that I could not find any straight forward answer to my
question searching the web. </Tetraodon_nigroviridis/>
Thanks
Nagesh
_______________________________________________
Bioinformatics.Org general forum -
BiO_Bulletin_Board at bioinformatics.org
https://bioinformatics.org/mailman/listinfo/bio_bulletin_board
More information about the BBB
mailing list