Eric Engelhard <eric_cl@pacbell.net> writes: > Remote booting is slick, but is the advantage really that clear for this > kind of cluster (embarrassingly parallel, diskfull, and none-too-big)? > The NFS share on the master node holds the install image(s) and BLAST > executables. Any node specific features can be handled with > environmental variable calls. [...] I've been thinking about setting up a Beowulf and giving these issues a lot of thought. The advantage of going "diskless" is primarily administrative, I think. Basically, you need some way of keeping your clients in sync as you make changes over time. There seem to be only two good ways to do this: share everything over NFS, or replicate changes. SystemImager is an interesting take on the latter, and I like the core rsync idea, but it looks more complicated than I was hoping for, and so I'm leaning towards "diskless". (By "diskless", I mean not that the hosts have no disks, but that no (or almost no) state is stored there. So, for example, the disks could be wiped and mounted on /tmp at each boot.) Mike