Hi Nathan: (punchline: the newly compiled SUSE m64 binaries seem to work) Using the version I just put up at my site, and using the -n switch on the formatdb gives me this for the blastall run: BLASTX 2.2.6 [Apr-09-2003] Reference: Altschul, Stephen F., Thomas L. Madden, Alejandro A. Schaffer, Jinghui Zhang, Zheng Zhang, Webb Miller, and David J. Lipman (1997), "Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs", Nucleic Acids Res. 25:3389-3402. Query= 25094 Lambda-PRL2 Arabidopsis thaliana cDNA clone 251F2T7, mRNA sequence. (604 letters) Database: nr 1,479,768 sequences; 476,959,297 total letters Searching..................................................done Score E Sequences producing significant alignments: (bits) Value gb|AAK91384.1| AT3g19760/MMB12_21 [Arabidopsis thaliana] >gi|250... 184 1e-45 ref|NP_188610.1| eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4A (eI... 184 1e-45 pir||T51737 RNA helicase RH2 [imported] - Arabidopsis thaliana >... 184 1e-45 ref|XP_312776.1| ENSANGP00000020417 [Anopheles gambiae] >gi|3017... 178 6e-44 . . . >gb|AAK91384.1| AT3g19760/MMB12_21 [Arabidopsis thaliana] gb|AAN72219.1| At3g19760/MMB12_21 [Arabidopsis thaliana] Length = 408 Score = 184 bits (466), Expect = 1e-45 Identities = 91/91 (100%), Positives = 91/91 (100%) Frame = +3 Query: 27 NEFRSGDSRVLITTDVWARGIDVQQVSLVINYDLPNNRELYIHRIGRSGRFGRKGVAINF 206 NEFRSGDSRVLITTDVWARGIDVQQVSLVINYDLPNNRELYIHRIGRSGRFGRKGVAINF Sbjct: 318 NEFRSGDSRVLITTDVWARGIDVQQVSLVINYDLPNNRELYIHRIGRSGRFGRKGVAINF 377 Query: 207 VKSDDIKILRDIEQYYSTQIDEMPMNVADLI 299 VKSDDIKILRDIEQYYSTQIDEMPMNVADLI Sbjct: 378 VKSDDIKILRDIEQYYSTQIDEMPMNVADLI 408 >ref|NP_188610.1| eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4A (eIF-4A), putative [Arabidopsis thaliana] Length = 408 Score = 184 bits (466), Expect = 1e-45 . . . In short, it appears to work, though I need to compare this to the same run I have done by hand a while ago. If you want my test cases (and scripts), send me an email offline, and I will give you a pointer to them. Joe On Sat, 2003-08-16 at 11:38, Nathan O. Siemers wrote: > > Nope. I feared this would not solve the corruption of the blast > database itself: > > (testy database created with formatdb -n testy...) > > this is with my compiled version of formatdb using the suggested IBM > config mod... > > > > opt:/u1/gcgblast # blastall -v 1 -b 1 -a 2 -d testy -i refseq_fly_prot > -p tblastn > TBLASTN 2.2.6 [Apr-09-2003] > > > Reference: Altschul, Stephen F., Thomas L. Madden, Alejandro A. Schaffer, > Jinghui Zhang, Zheng Zhang, Webb Miller, and David J. Lipman (1997), > "Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search > programs", Nucleic Acids Res. 25:3389-3402. > > Query= BMSPROT:NP_478140 histone H2A; histone [Drosophila > melanogaster]. [Subset=EMBL/GENBANK/DDBJ,REFSEQ] > (124 letters) > > Database: test > 62,463 sequences; 6,244,139,235 total letters > > Searching..................................................done > > Score E > Sequences producing significant alignments: (bits) > Value > > [blastall] ERROR: ncbiapi [000.000] BMSPROT:NP_478140: ObjMgrChoice: > pointer [0] type [1] not found > Unknown > 199 5e-50 > > [blastall] ERROR: ncbiapi [000.000] BMSPROT:NP_478140: ObjMgrChoice: > pointer [0] type [1] not found > [blastall] ERROR: ncbiapi [000.000] BMSPROT:NP_478140: ObjMgrChoice: > pointer [0] type [1] not found > [blastall] ERROR: ncbiapi [000.000] BMSPROT:NP_478140: ObjMgrChoice: > pointer [0] type [1] not found > > Score = 199 bits (506), Expect = 5e-50 > > Query: 16 SRSNRAGLQFPVGRIHRLLRKGNYAERVGAGAPVYLAAVMEYLAAEVLELAGNAARDNKK 75 > [blastall] ERROR: ncbiapi [000.000] BMSPROT:NP_478140: ObjMgrChoice: > pointer [0] type [1] not found > > Query: 76 TRIIPRHLQLAIRNDEELNKLLSGVTIAQGGVLPNIQAVLLPKKTE 121 > [blastall] ERROR: ncbiapi [000.000] BMSPROT:NP_478140: ObjMgrChoice: > pointer [0] type [1] not found > > > [blastall] ERROR: ncbiapi [000.000] BMSPROT:NP_478140: ObjMgrChoice: > pointer [0] type [1] not found > [blastall] ERROR: ncbiapi [000.000] BMSPROT:NP_478140: ObjMgrChoice: > pointer [0] type [1] not found > [blastall] ERROR: ncbiapi [000.000] BMSPROT:NP_478140: ObjMgrChoice: > pointer [0] type [1] not found > > Score = 196 bits (497), Expect = 5e-49 > Identities = 0/106 (0%), Positives = 0/106 (0%) > Frame = +2 > > Query: 16 SRSNRAGLQFPVGRIHRLLRKGNYAERVGAGAPVYLAAVMEYLAAEVLELAGNAARDNKK 75 > [blastall] ERROR: ncbiapi [000.000] BMSPROT:NP_478140: ObjMgrChoice: > pointer [0] type [1] not found > > Query: 76 TRIIPRHLQLAIRNDEELNKLLSGVTIAQGGVLPNIQAVLLPKKTE 121 > [blastall] ERROR: ncbiapi [000.000] BMSPROT:NP_478140: ObjMgrChoice: > pointer [0] type [1] not found > > > > > Joseph Landman wrote: > > Hi Nathan, Carlos, et al: > > > > I have verified on the test system that a formatdb without the -n > > option gives you the (null).[pn]al. Using the -n option provides a > > workaround. That is > > > > formatdb -i swissprot -v 2 -o T -p T > > > > does not work properly, though > > > > formatdb -i swissprot -n swissprot -v 2 -o T -p T > > > > does. I have not had the chance to try a real run, I will do that a > > little later today. > > > > This formatdb is > > > > file formatdb > > formatdb: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), > > dynamically linked (uses shared libs), not stripped > > > > I rebuilt (as an m64 binary!) using Lawrence's recommended define, and > > ran that as well: > > > > test> file formatdb > > formatdb: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), > > dynamically linked (uses shared libs), not stripped > > test> formatdb -i swissprot -n swissprot -v 2 -o T -p T > > test> ls > > formatdb.log swissprot.06.pin swissprot.12.psd swissprot.19.phr > > swissprot swissprot.06.pnd swissprot.12.psi swissprot.19.pin > > swissprot.00.phr swissprot.06.pni swissprot.12.psq swissprot.19.pnd > > swissprot.00.pin swissprot.06.psd swissprot.13.phr swissprot.19.pni > > swissprot.00.pnd swissprot.06.psi swissprot.13.pin swissprot.19.psd > > swissprot.00.pni swissprot.06.psq swissprot.13.pnd swissprot.19.psi > > swissprot.00.psd swissprot.07.phr swissprot.13.pni swissprot.19.psq > > swissprot.00.psi swissprot.07.pin swissprot.13.psd swissprot.20.phr > > swissprot.00.psq swissprot.07.pnd swissprot.13.psi swissprot.20.pin > > swissprot.01.phr swissprot.07.pni swissprot.13.psq swissprot.20.pnd > > swissprot.01.pin swissprot.07.psd swissprot.14.phr swissprot.20.pni > > swissprot.01.pnd swissprot.07.psi swissprot.14.pin swissprot.20.psd > > swissprot.01.pni swissprot.07.psq swissprot.14.pnd swissprot.20.psi > > swissprot.01.psd swissprot.08.phr swissprot.14.pni swissprot.20.psq > > swissprot.01.psi swissprot.08.pin swissprot.14.psd swissprot.21.phr > > swissprot.01.psq swissprot.08.pnd swissprot.14.psi swissprot.21.pin > > swissprot.02.phr swissprot.08.pni swissprot.14.psq swissprot.21.pnd > > swissprot.02.pin swissprot.08.psd swissprot.15.phr swissprot.21.pni > > swissprot.02.pnd swissprot.08.psi swissprot.15.pin swissprot.21.psd > > swissprot.02.pni swissprot.08.psq swissprot.15.pnd swissprot.21.psi > > swissprot.02.psd swissprot.09.phr swissprot.15.pni swissprot.21.psq > > swissprot.02.psi swissprot.09.pin swissprot.15.psd swissprot.22.phr > > swissprot.02.psq swissprot.09.pnd swissprot.15.psi swissprot.22.pin > > swissprot.03.phr swissprot.09.pni swissprot.15.psq swissprot.22.pnd > > swissprot.03.pin swissprot.09.psd swissprot.16.phr swissprot.22.pni > > swissprot.03.pnd swissprot.09.psi swissprot.16.pin swissprot.22.psd > > swissprot.03.pni swissprot.09.psq swissprot.16.pnd swissprot.22.psi > > swissprot.03.psd swissprot.10.phr swissprot.16.pni swissprot.22.psq > > swissprot.03.psi swissprot.10.pin swissprot.16.psd swissprot.23.phr > > swissprot.03.psq swissprot.10.pnd swissprot.16.psi swissprot.23.pin > > swissprot.04.phr swissprot.10.pni swissprot.16.psq swissprot.23.pnd > > swissprot.04.pin swissprot.10.psd swissprot.17.phr swissprot.23.pni > > swissprot.04.pnd swissprot.10.psi swissprot.17.pin swissprot.23.psd > > swissprot.04.pni swissprot.10.psq swissprot.17.pnd swissprot.23.psi > > swissprot.04.psd swissprot.11.phr swissprot.17.pni swissprot.23.psq > > swissprot.04.psi swissprot.11.pin swissprot.17.psd swissprot.24.phr > > swissprot.04.psq swissprot.11.pnd swissprot.17.psi swissprot.24.pin > > swissprot.05.phr swissprot.11.pni swissprot.17.psq swissprot.24.pnd > > swissprot.05.pin swissprot.11.psd swissprot.18.phr swissprot.24.pni > > swissprot.05.pnd swissprot.11.psi swissprot.18.pin swissprot.24.psd > > swissprot.05.pni swissprot.11.psq swissprot.18.pnd swissprot.24.psi > > swissprot.05.psd swissprot.12.phr swissprot.18.pni swissprot.24.psq > > swissprot.05.psi swissprot.12.pin swissprot.18.psd swissprot.pal > > swissprot.05.psq swissprot.12.pnd swissprot.18.psi > > swissprot.06.phr swissprot.12.pni swissprot.18.psq > > test> cat swissprot.pal > > # > > # Alias file created Sat Aug 16 16:03:34 2003 > > # > > # > > TITLE swissprot > > # > > DBLIST swissprot.00 swissprot.01 swissprot.02 swissprot.03 swissprot.04 > > swissprot.05 swissprot.06 swissprot.07 swissprot.08 swissprot.09 > > swissprot.10 swissprot.11 swissprot.12 swissprot.13 swissprot.14 > > swissprot.15 swissprot.16 swissprot.17 swissprot.18 swissprot.19 > > swissprot.20 swissprot.21 swissprot.22 swissprot.23 swissprot.24 > > # > > #GILIST > > # > > #OIDLIST > > # > > > > Looks like this is working. Is the use of the -n switch on formatdb an > > acceptable workaround for the (null) problem? > > > > Note: This machine doesn't have enough disk space to test the binaries > > with a big database file. I will post the SUSE 8.2 compiled binaries > > and linux.ncbi.mk in a bit. Please let me know if they work for you. > > They will be in http://scalableinformatics.com/downloads/opteron/ncbi as > > blastall.suse.gz and formatdb.suse.gz as well as the > > ncbitoolkit.suse.tar.gz tarball. > > > > Note: I have reorganized the opteron compiled bits to reside under > > opteron/... > > > > Joe > > > > > > On Sat, 2003-08-16 at 07:37, Nathan Siemers wrote: > > > >>Hello Joe, > >> > >>Folks at IBM are suggesting this mod to compile blastall on opteron 64, > >>and for the blastall binary itself it > >>seems to work: If the full 64 bit works on redhat, then updating the > >>gcc and libs may be the easiest way > >>to go, but I would appreciate it if you test formatdb on large (6gig) > >>input databases to see what it does... > >>see the notes below. > >> > >> > >>Nathan > >> > >> > >> > >>2) BLAST > >>Dr. Lawrence Hannon successfully resolved the coredump problem that he > >>encountered with the 64-bit BLAST built using the default configuration > >>files with gcc as downloaded from NCBI. He modified the NCBI_CFLAGS1 flag > >>in ncbi/platform/linux.ncbi.mk to include the definition flag > >>-DOS_UNIX_PPCLINUX which effects how the source ncbi/build/tsprintf.c > >>treats variable arguments to get the gcc build to work. Both Lawrence > >>and I had tested this 64-bit BLAST and so far all tests were successful. > >> > >> > >>However, the resulting binaries haven't passed all my tests. In > >>particular, formatdb > >>seems to have problems creating intact dbs when it creates multiple volumes: > >> > >>Tests against small databases seem to be working, but... > >> > >> Some things are still not functioning perfectly: > >> > >> Given a large database file that must be split up into volumes, the > >>resulting .nal or .pal file produced by formatdb does not have the name > >>of the original file, a '(null)' is produced instead: > >> > >>-rw-r--r-- 1 rioscb root 270 Aug 15 08:25 (null).nal > >> > >> This was run via: > >> > >> formatdb -p F -i file > >> > >> where file was a 6gig database of nucleotide sequences. > >> > >>The file contents of the .nal file also has (null) where the original > >>file name is supposed to be: > >> > >># > >># Alias file created Fri Aug 15 08:25:05 2003 > >># > >># > >>TITLE NCBI_31_Masked_Chromosomes.shredded.100000.50000 > >># > >>DBLIST (null).00 (null).01 (null).02 (null).03 (null).04 (null).05 > >>(null).06 (null).07 (null).08 (null).09 (null).10 (null).11 (null).12 > >># > >>#GILIST > >># > >>#OIDLIST > >># > >> > >>Manually fixing this .nal file and renaming it appropriately lets me run > >>blastall against the file, but there are severe errors: possible pointer > >>problems, blastall can't retrieve the name of the query, and the > >>alignment is garbage: > >> > >>________________________ > >># blastall -a 2 -p tblastn -v 1 -b 1 -e 0.00001 -i refseq_fly_prot -d > >>NCBI_31_Masked_Chromosomes.shredded.100000.50000 > >>__________________________ > >> > >> > >>TBLASTN 2.2.6 [Apr-09-2003] > >> > >> > >>Reference: Altschul, Stephen F., Thomas L. Madden, Alejandro A. Schaffer, > >>Jinghui Zhang, Zheng Zhang, Webb Miller, and David J. Lipman (1997), > >>"Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search > >>programs", Nucleic Acids Res. 25:3389-3402. > >> > >>Query= BMSPROT:NP_478140 histone H2A; histone [Drosophila > >>melanogaster]. [Subset=EMBL/GENBANK/DDBJ,REFSEQ] > >> (124 letters) > >> > >>Database: NCBI_31_Masked_Chromosomes.shredded.100000.50000 > >> 62,463 sequences; 6,244,139,235 total letters > >> > >>Searching..................................................done > >> > >> Score E > >>Sequences producing significant alignments: (bits) > >>Value > >> > >>[blastall] ERROR: ncbiapi [000.000] BMSPROT:NP_478140: ObjMgrChoice: > >>pointer [0] type [1] not found > >>Unknown 199 5e-50 > >> > >>[blastall] ERROR: ncbiapi [000.000] BMSPROT:NP_478140: ObjMgrChoice: > >>pointer [0] type [1] not found > >>[blastall] ERROR: ncbiapi [000.000] BMSPROT:NP_478140: ObjMgrChoice: > >>pointer [0] type [1] not found > >>[blastall] ERROR: ncbiapi [000.000] BMSPROT:NP_478140: ObjMgrChoice: > >>pointer [0] type [1] not found > >> > >> Score = 199 bits (506), Expect = 5e-50 > >> > >>Query: 16 SRSNRAGLQFPVGRIHRLLRKGNYAERVGAGAPVYLAAVMEYLAAEVLELAGNAARDNKK 75 > >>[blastall] ERROR: ncbiapi [000.000] BMSPROT:NP_478140: ObjMgrChoice: > >>pointer [0] type [1] not found > >> > >>Query: 76 TRIIPRHLQLAIRNDEELNKLLSGVTIAQGGVLPNIQAVLLPKKTE 121 > >>[blastall] ERROR: ncbiapi [000.000] BMSPROT:NP_478140: ObjMgrChoice: > >>pointer [0] type [1] not found > >> > >> > >>[blastall] ERROR: ncbiapi [000.000] BMSPROT:NP_478140: ObjMgrChoice: > >>pointer [0] type [1] not found > >>[blastall] ERROR: ncbiapi [000.000] BMSPROT:NP_478140: ObjMgrChoice: > >>pointer [0] type [1] not found > >>[blastall] ERROR: ncbiapi [000.000] BMSPROT:NP_478140: ObjMgrChoice: > >>pointer [0] type [1] not found > >> > >> Score = 196 bits (497), Expect = 5e-49 > >> Identities = 0/106 (0%), Positives = 0/106 (0%) > >> Frame = +2 > >> > >>Query: 16 SRSNRAGLQFPVGRIHRLLRKGNYAERVGAGAPVYLAAVMEYLAAEVLELAGNAARDNKK 75 > >>[blastall] ERROR: ncbiapi [000.000] BMSPROT:NP_478140: ObjMgrChoice: > >>pointer [0] type [1] not found > >> > >>Query: 76 TRIIPRHLQLAIRNDEELNKLLSGVTIAQGGVLPNIQAVLLPKKTE 121 > >>[blastall] ERROR: ncbiapi [000.000] BMSPROT:NP_478140: ObjMgrChoice: > >>pointer [0] type [1] not found > >> > >> > >> > >>All this work was done with: > >> > >>gcc version: > >> > >>Reading specs from /usr/lib64/gcc-lib/x86_64-suse-linux/3.2.2/specs > >>Configured with: ../configure --enable-threads=posix --prefix=/usr > >>--with-local-prefix=/usr/local --infodir=/usr/share/info > >>--mandir=/usr/share/man --libdir=/usr/lib64 > >>--enable-languages=c,c++,f77,objc,java,ada --enable-libgcj > >>--with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/g++ --with-slibdir=/lib > >>--with-system-zlib --enable-shared --enable-__cxa_atexit x86_64-suse-linux > >>Thread model: posix > >>gcc version 3.2.2 (SuSE Linux) > >> > >> > >>ldd on the executables gives: > >> > >>opt:/u1/gcgblast # ldd /usr/local/bin/blastall > >> libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x0000002a9566a000) > >> libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x0000002a957c2000) > >> libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x0000002a958e2000) > >> /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 => /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 > >>(0x0000002a95556000) > >> > >> > >> > >>Looking back at the log of the Make, these messages are disturbing, and > >>they appear throughout the make process: > >> > >>gcc -pipe -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -O2 -c > >>-DOS_UNIX_PPCLINUX -I../include -I/usr/X11R6/include -L/usr/X11R6/lib > >>-DWIN_MOTIF cdnewlib.c > >>In file included from ../include/ncbi.h:57, > >> from ../include/asn.h:125, > >> from ../include/objacces.h:64, > >> from ../include/cdromlib.h:71, > >> from cdnewlib.c:208: > >>../include/ncbilcl.h:104:2: warning: #warning Unknown processor type. > >>Please define something appropriate. > >>cdnewlib.c: In function `cd3_CdDocAsnOpen': > >>cdnewlib.c:1342: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size > >>cdnewlib.c: In function `UidIndex_ReadPage': > >>cdnewlib.c:1937: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size > >>cdnewlib.c:1945: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>Joseph Landman wrote: > >> > >> > >>>Hi Nathan: > >>> > >>> I just ran into this myself. I built the binaries on RedHat GinGin64 > >>>with the gcc-3.3 compiler. I just tried a SUSE 8.2 platform, and had to > >>>recompile the toolkit. If you want to use the binary, I think you need > >>>the relevant gcc tree installed. I think I might have that here. I > >>>will look. > >>> > >>> For reasons that are not all that clear to me now, I had to use the > >>>-m32 flag to generate a working binary on SUSE. The -m32 forces the use > >>>of the IA32 ABI, which means that you cannot use some of the nicer > >>>features of the Opteron (large memory, 64 bit mode, etc). I hope to > >>>investigate this more. > >>> > >>> A kind soul just gave me access to their opteron for some testing. > >>>Compiling with -m64 generates a binary, though upon completion of a test > >>>run, it generates an ABORT. Strace wasn't all that helpful here. I am > >>>trying to track this down. > >>> > >>> I can give you my -m32 binaries if you would like. I would like to > >>>get the -m64 binaries working (for SUSE). > >>> > >>>Joe > >>> > >>>On Fri, 2003-08-15 at 22:58, Nathan Siemers wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>Hello Joe, > >>>> > >>>>My default SUSE opteron configuration may not have the libs to run your > >>>>build: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>opt:/u1/gcgblast # formatdb -p F -i test & > >>>>formatdb: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.3' not found (required by > >>>>formatdb) > >>>>[1] 10941 > >>>>[1] Exit 1 formatdb -p F -i test > >>>>opt:/u1/gcgblast # ldd /usr/local/bin/formatdb > >>>>/usr/local/bin/formatdb: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.3' not found > >>>>(required by /usr/local/bin/formatdb) > >>>> libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x0000002a9566a000) > >>>> libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x0000002a957c2000) > >>>> /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 => /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 > >>>>(0x0000002a95556000) > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>I assume these are 64 bit executables? Is there a newer libc needed? > >>>> > >>>>Thanks for your (past and present) help with the opteron platform. > >>>> > >>>> Nathan > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>Joseph Landman wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>Hi Doug: > >>>>> > >>>>>These are 2.2.6. The tree's VERSION (ncbi/VERSION) reads: > >>>>> > >>>>>[landman@squash.scalableinformatics.com:/big/t/ncbi] > >>>>>8 >cat VERSION > >>>>>Tue Apr 22 10:41:40 EDT 2003 > >>>>> > >>>>>Please let me know if you have problems with them. This was a first > >>>>>pass at getting working systems. > >>>>> > >>>>>Joe > >>>>> > >>>>>On Tue, 2003-08-12 at 20:17, Doug Shubert wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>Hello Joe, > >>>>>>What version of ncbitools are you working with ? > >>>>>>Doug > >>>>>> > >>>>>>Joe Landman wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>Its up. Please let me know if it works. This is a snapshot from a > >>>>>>>build done in June, Download is > >>>>>>>http://scalableinformatics.com/downloads/opteron.ncbitools.tar.gz . It > >>>>>>>is 29MB. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>Joe > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>On Tue, 2003-08-12 at 15:46, Joe Landman wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>On Tue, 2003-08-12 at 13:11, Nathan Siemers wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>That's great news, Joe. Has this build passed any regression tests, > >>>>>>>>>i.e. rigorous > >>>>>>>>>comparison to output from blastall on other architectures? > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>I have not had an opteron to run on long enough to run my normal tests. > >>>>>>>>It did generate the same results for my short tests. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>-- > >>>>>>>Joseph Landman, Ph.D > >>>>>>>Scalable Informatics LLC, > >>>>>>>email: landman@scalableinformatics.com > >>>>>>>web : http://scalableinformatics.com > >>>>>>>phone: +1 734 612 4615 > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>_______________________________________________ > >>>>>>>Bioclusters maillist - Bioclusters@bioinformatics.org > >>>>>>>https://bioinformatics.org/mailman/listinfo/bioclusters > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>_______________________________________________ > >>>>>>Bioclusters maillist - Bioclusters@bioinformatics.org > >>>>>>https://bioinformatics.org/mailman/listinfo/bioclusters > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>_______________________________________________ > >>>>Bioclusters maillist - Bioclusters@bioinformatics.org > >>>>https://bioinformatics.org/mailman/listinfo/bioclusters > >>>> > >>>> > >> > >>_______________________________________________ > >>Bioclusters maillist - Bioclusters@bioinformatics.org > >>https://bioinformatics.org/mailman/listinfo/bioclusters -- Joseph Landman, Ph.D Scalable Informatics LLC email: landman@scalableinformatics.com web: http://scalableinformatics.com phone: +1 734 612 4615