The consumer version of RedHat apparently will become "Fedora": http://fedora.redhat.com/ But, Mandrake is also based on RedHat: http://www.mandrakesoft.com/ Has anyone used Mandrake for HPC work, or is it really just a workstation distro? Cheers. Jeff J.W. Bizzaro wrote: > (Added Biodevelopers to the thread.) > > There's a discussion about this on Slashdot, including mention of the > Fedora project: > > http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/11/03/1749259 > > Cheers. > Jeff > > Chris Dagdigian wrote: > >> >> Another item that has been on my mind recently... >> >> What are people doing about RedHat deciding to kill off their consumer >> product line? Are people going to pay the freight for Redhat >> Enterprise Linux or are people just going to use Suse/Debian/Gentoo etc. >> >> My needs are pretty simple but I'm having a hard time placing myself >> into Redhat's current product plans. >> >> I need: >> >> 1. A stable OS with a product lifetime of at least 1 year (ideally 2+) >> 2. Product errata, updates and security patches for full lifespan >> 3. No OS or product phone/email support or SLA >> >> The RHL transition to Fedora Linux is fine but it sounds as if the OS >> is going to change very fast (major updates 2-3 times per year). On >> the plus side it is still free and the leaders seem committed to fast >> errata and security updates. Still I can't see using this on a >> production cluster due to the pace of change and the chance that I'd >> be left without updates if I froze on a particular Fedora release. >> >> I can justify (maybe) the cost for the $125 product (Redhat WS) that >> they are pitching towards compute clusters. The update services and >> 5-year product lifespan is worth paying for. The big question for me >> is what do I have to pay _after_ the initial $125 purchase. I can't >> seem to find any info on the Redhat website telling me how much I'll >> have to pay for updates after my intial 1-year RedHat Network service >> runs out. >> >> This also leaves the question of what RHEL flavor to run on cluster >> head nodes, fileservers and database machines. $349 for RH ES could be >> justified for a critical node but damn what if I want to run that >> stuff on Opteron or Itanium or a node with 4CPUs? The cost for RH AS >> (starting at $1400) is not justifiable to me. Putting a 'cheap' RHEL >> flavor on a head node and manually compiling/updating/supporting >> additional network services built by hand from source or .srpms may be >> more of an operational headache than the cost savings justify. >> >> I'm torn right now between diving back into Gentoo/Debian or possibly >> jumping on the Suse bandwagon given their existing support for Opteron >> etc. Novell just bought Suse today so who knows what that is going to do. >> >> I'd be interested in knowing how current RHL users are planning the >> transition and how future cluster buyers are changing their plans. >> Personally I think I'm going to need to stay on top of RHEL for >> project that demand it while also maintaining some sort of deep >> familiarity with one or more alternatives. >> >> -Chris >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Bioclusters maillist - Bioclusters@bioinformatics.org >> https://bioinformatics.org/mailman/listinfo/bioclusters > > > -- J.W. Bizzaro jeff@bioinformatics.org President, Bioinformatics.Org http://bioinformatics.org/~jeff "As we enjoy great advantages from the inventions of others, we should be glad of an opportunity to serve others by any invention of ours; and this we should do freely and generously." -- Benjamin Franklin --