[Bioclusters] gigabit ethernet performance
Joe Landman
bioclusters@bioinformatics.org
Mon, 12 Jul 2004 15:49:09 -0400
Jon Bernard wrote:
> Something like
>
> pax -w | ssh somehost 'pax -r'
>
> has the same effect as scp, but transfers files much more quickly.
Thats odd, as scp and ssh both share the same encryption engines, and
encrypt all traffic. May I ask how you measured this?
>
> My quick testing has also shown pax to be somewhat faster than tar in
> this case.
>
> Jon Bernard
>
> Peng Chen wrote:
>
>> Surprisingly, the SCP performance is heavily bound to CPU power. In
>> the following table we compared performance among four different
>> machines. Note that this is NOT benchmark, we use this table only to
>> understand where is the bottleneck.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bioclusters maillist - Bioclusters@bioinformatics.org
> https://bioinformatics.org/mailman/listinfo/bioclusters
--
Joseph Landman, Ph.D
Scalable Informatics LLC,
email: landman@scalableinformatics.com
web : http://scalableinformatics.com
phone: +1 734 612 4615