[Bioclusters] BLAT users?

David Adelson bioclusters@bioinformatics.org
Tue, 2 Nov 2004 07:42:06 -0600


It was not OSX specific and would probably only have affected you if 
you were using the blast8 output option.  It looks like the problems 
were solved as determined from a sample job I am still running on one 
node.  I need to check the cluster version next, but do not anticipate 
problems if the single node job completes without problems.

Dave

On Nov 2, 2004, at 3:23 AM, Ran Rubinstein wrote:

> I was asking because I am using BLAT with bigger databases (but 
> smaller query load) on IRIX, with great success - but this could still 
> affect me when the system goes into production. Is it an OSX specific 
> issue? Were your problems solved?
>
> Thanks,
>
> David Adelson wrote:
>
>> Thanks.  Stops working means no output generated for a considerable 
>> time and 0%cpu usage for the process for some time.
>>
>> Jim Kent worked on this over the weekend and actually found 3 memory 
>> leaks that he fixed.  The new source and binaries are available for 
>> download from his website/ftpsite as v31.
>>
>> Dave Adelson
>>
>> On Nov 1, 2004, at 10:18 AM, Ran Rubinstein wrote:
>>
>>> Hi David
>>>
>>> Please elaborate on what does 'stop working' mean. The leaks program 
>>> can find a lot more memory leaks and the program can still be 
>>> correct - try looking at the process memory usage, and see if it 
>>> grows over time, and whether it reaches the size of the physical 
>>> RAM.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> David Adelson wrote:
>>>
>>>> This may be the wrong forum to look for an answer, but I thought I 
>>>> would start here.
>>>>
>>>> We have been using BLAT on G4 Xserves (2GB RAM) for some time now.  
>>>> Given the memory limitations, we carve up the database into chunks 
>>>> so that we don't get a malloc error message telling us we have run 
>>>> out of huge memory.  We then parallelize the job and run the chunks 
>>>> in parallel on our cluster.  This works for modest query sizes 
>>>> (15,000 ESTs vs 1.2GB database-hs_chroms1-6).  However, when we 
>>>> scaled up to larger queries (493365 ESTs vs 1.3GB database-bovine 
>>>> genome 200,000scaffolds) we see blat just sort of stop working 
>>>> after a while.  I ran the leaks program and found 91832 memory 
>>>> leaks, so the problem seems to be memory related.  I would be 
>>>> curious to know if anyone else has seen this type of behavior with 
>>>> BLAT.  I am in the process of contacting Jim Kent about this, but 
>>>> thought it would not hurt to ask some other knowledgeable 
>>>> computational biologists about this.
>>>>
>>>> thanks in advance,
>>>>
>>>> Dave Adelson
>>>> Texas A&M University
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Bioclusters maillist  -  Bioclusters@bioinformatics.org
>>>> https://bioinformatics.org/mailman/listinfo/bioclusters
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Ran Rubinstein
>>> Dept. of Molecular Biology
>>> Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University, Ein Karem, Jerusalem, Israel
>>> Tel +972-2-6757906 Fax +972-2-6758992
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Bioclusters maillist  -  Bioclusters@bioinformatics.org
>>> https://bioinformatics.org/mailman/listinfo/bioclusters
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bioclusters maillist  -  Bioclusters@bioinformatics.org
>> https://bioinformatics.org/mailman/listinfo/bioclusters
>>
>>
>
>
> -- 
> Ran Rubinstein
> Dept. of Molecular Biology
> Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University, Ein Karem, Jerusalem, Israel
> Tel +972-2-6757906 Fax +972-2-6758992
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bioclusters maillist  -  Bioclusters@bioinformatics.org
> https://bioinformatics.org/mailman/listinfo/bioclusters
>