[Bioclusters] O'Reilly Clusters Book Review
Tim Cutts
tjrc at sanger.ac.uk
Sat Feb 26 06:11:03 EST 2005
On 25 Feb 2005, at 5:43 pm, James Cuff wrote:
> I think we should be a bit more proactive here. It's a real small
> world. There was a mention of a 'bioclusters book' on this list a
> while ago... maybe we should lead by example? I'd be happy throw in a
> chapter...
I'm not sure the market is big enough. And anyway, I think the
principles are fairly generic. I used to think bioinformatics tasks
were somehow different, and that bioinformatics clusters had different
rules. The more I talk to other cluster managers around the world, the
less I think that is true. There are plenty of other disciplines with
similarly embarrassingly parallel, high data/cpu ratio problems, and
they build clusters in the same way.
> However, all I know about writing books is that takes for ever and
> ever, it's really hard work, big fat personal egos get in the way of
> good content, most of it is out of date by the time you finish, and in
> the end no one ever seems to thank you for it.
How many of us actually really learn anything from "how-to" style
books? I don't. I get that stuff from the web, mailing lists, and
talking to people. I generally only find O'Reilly books useful if they
are a more "reference style".
Tim
--
Dr Tim Cutts
Informatics Systems Group, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute
GPG: 1024D/E3134233 FE3D 6C73 BBD6 726A A3F5 860B 3CDD 3F56 E313 4233
More information about the Bioclusters
mailing list