I might suggest a look at BioBrew or Rocks as a cluster base, as it makes the administration aspect fairly simple. Glen Otero has done a fine job on BioBrew, so most people will not have to think hard about the installation. Support for using BioBrew and Rocks is available via email lists, or via companies (Glen's, mine, others). You could also look at other bits that strive to make the clustering bit simple: Warewulf + cAos/Centos/RH/SuSE/..., Oscar (v4 came out a few months ago), and others. There are many options, but simplicity/ease of install and use would be along the Rocks/BioBrew direction. If you need to customize it (many labs could run it out of the box), then it gets complex. Joe Matthew Hudson wrote: > > Another key consideration is: How much sysadmin experience / effort does > this life science group have? Maintaining and updating a Linux cluster > built from scratch can be a challenge for a group of biology PhDs with > no full-time sysadmin, not to mention the cost of power consumtion, > cooling etc.. Sun is a little better than building your own Linux > system, Apple really try to make this easier and might be a better > solution, but their cluster software is expensive. If it's just an EST > project you might recommend they get one or two good size SMP machines > (maybe the new quad Opterons from Sun, with at least 8GB RAM) and forget > about the cluster. -- Joseph Landman, Ph.D Founder and CEO Scalable Informatics LLC, email: landman at scalableinformatics.com web : http://www.scalableinformatics.com phone: +1 734 786 8423 fax : +1 734 786 8452 cell : +1 734 612 4615