On 14 Jan 2006, at 5:07 am, Farul Mohd. Ghazali wrote: > This has been an interesting and very eye opening discussion for me. > > Joe, I'm aware of SGI's woes. I was using SGI RASC as an example since > I don't have much experience in hardware accelerators in general aside > from a brief fling with Paracel 5 years ago. I do like their > interconnect and SSI technology but their long term viability isn't > great. The death of SGI has been predicted for many years. I very much doubt it is imminent. Various Western governments (mostly the black helicopter brigade) have way too much invested in SGI's unique product line to let them go under. SGI are in the same situation as Cray; the US government will keep them alive as long as they need support and no-one else has a competing product. This isn't actually that bad a position to be in. It's the same reason that VMS will never die, and that HP are being forced to support Alpha for many years. Take all this with a big dose of In My Personal Opinion (other than my first sentence, which is definitely fact!) Tim -- Dr Tim Cutts Informatics Systems Group, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute GPG: 1024D/E3134233 FE3D 6C73 BBD6 726A A3F5 860B 3CDD 3F56 E313 4233