Hi, On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 12:27:26PM +0300, Tommi Hassinen wrote: > So, to summarize, there is not much new, but the old stuff is packed in a > more neat and clever way, so that it can be handled more easily in the > future. Now that I started packaging the bunch of releases for Debian, I am not very happy about the library version breakage (i.e. the library changed e.g. from libghemical.so.0 to libghemical.so.2), were there really backwards-incompatible changes? So far, not a lot of software is using mopac or libghemical so it does not matter much as I/we maintain all anyway, but if application developers cannot target stable APIs, they will not attract a lot of hackers. Of course, if there was a valid need to break the API, that is fine, but I suspect it was simply the coupling of library version to package version, which is usually the wrong thing to do. Michael