On 2004-11-21 (18:28) Dan Bolser wrote: > >I have a few comments, but I am not sure if people would care enough >to 'vote' on the issue yet... > >Email spoofing is rare, so having a subscriber only policy gets rid >of most spam attacks (which on the whole are opportunist and not >directed). Mailman on bioinformatics.org should be compatible with a >spam filter, bouncing suspicious email to the sender automatically, >and automatically allowing it through on the completion of some >'human' task. > hi Dan, I much prefer those lists that require you to respond to an email in order to confirm your list subscription. others force you to read a word embedded in an image (somewhat distorted to prevent bot subscribing). not so keen on that. >In the same vein, it is very simple to configure procmail or the >like to pickup mail with the word unsubscribe in the header and send >it to the list admin. > very true - or let the list members handle it. I have seen some quite creative and ROTFL responses to such requests - especially when the list info is at the bottom of every message! :-) >I never had a problem with spam on unmoderated lists at bioinfo.org, >but then again I have hefty spam filters this end. (Please feel free >to put my email address anywhere you like - I welcome the spam so my >filter can learn more :) - Besides it could be a good experiment ;) > you must be running a Bayesian filter - SpamSieve, perhaps? ;-) > > >On Sun, 21 Nov 2004, Eric Martz wrote: > >>At 11/20/04, you wrote: >> >>>Can I ask why this list is moderated? >>>