J.W. Bizzaro writes: > Guys, > > It just occured to me that you may not all agree regarding the use of > the GTK widget set. In fact, Konrad and Thomas (sorry if you don't like > being called Tom) thats ok ... :-) > have used Ousterhout's Tk widget set: Konrad used > Python/Tkinter in MMTK and Thomas used Tcl/Tk in BioWish and GRS. > > If any of you think we should reconsider our choice widget sets, please > speak up. I might be willing to switch to Tk if I find the reasons > compelling. In any case, I don't want anyone to walk away from the > project over this. Pleeeeeeeeeeease don't go! :-) I have no experience at all with GTK ... - but I like the GNU idea - which is only covered by Python and GTK ... > What are the pros and cons of each? This is what I think: > > Tk GTK > ========== ============= > Pro: Multiplatform Con: UNIX only for now Most of the Sequence Analysis tools are for UNIX only ... > Con: Tkinter requires Tcl Pro: Bindings to many languages are being made > Con: Rather large and slow Pro: Python/GTK seems faster > Con: Looks like old Motif Pro: Modern look and Theme-able What's wrong with Motif, No-one considering SunOS OpenWindows widgets :-) I mostly agree with this list - the core should have a rather fast widget set. - what is necessary is that people can easily add their own modules written in Tcl/Tk , perlTK, Vibrant, Motif e.t.c. It would be nice to have a interpreter for both perl and tcl in the core distribution (not the core) .. (shared, loadable libraries ???) My opinion: stay with Python/GTK ... -with tcl/tk it would not be a real GNU project ... would it ? -thomas -- Sicheritz Ponten Thomas E. Department of Molecular Biology blippblopp at linux.nu BMC, Uppsala University BMC: +46 18 4714214 BOX 590 S-751 24 UPPSALA Sweden Fax +46 18 557723 http://evolution.bmc.uu.se/~thomas Molecular Tcl: http://evolution.bmc.uu.se/~thomas/tcl Molecular Linux: http://evolution.bmc.uu.se/~thomas/mol_linux De Chelonian Mobile ... The Turtle Moves ...