[Pipet Devel] and still more infrastructure things
J.W. Bizzaro
bizzaro at bc.edu
Mon Mar 1 19:01:45 EST 1999
Carlos Maltzahn wrote:
>
> > What really worried me was the thought of a _single_ Paos process
> > managing _everything_, including every read and write for every
> > single XML, just to get workflow information. Agreed it would be
> > best to leave active workflow information to RAM.
> >
> > What is RAM?
>
> :-) Random Access Memory, as in 64 MB RAM, system memory, not on disk.
>
> Huh? What has physical memory to do with this?
>
I mean workflow information is best left to being stored in a data structure,
which I'm assuming is kept in physical memory. I guess I'm worng. No big deal.
Jeff
--
J.W. Bizzaro Phone: 617-552-3905
Boston College mailto:bizzaro at bc.edu
Department of Chemistry http://www.uml.edu/Dept/Chem/Bizzaro/
--
More information about the Pipet-Devel
mailing list