[Pipet Devel] summary for web
J.W. Bizzaro
bizzaro at geoserve.net
Wed Apr 5 10:24:31 EDT 2000
Brad Chapman wrote:
>
> It seemed to me the plan is pretty controversial since it proposes
> that all remote communication occur through the definition layer (the
> middle scripting layer) and not at the level of node processing. It
> was based on my attempts (probably failed) to learn about methods
> for implementing distributed systems based on Jarl's suggestion that
> all remote note authentication should occur in the definition layer.
> The proposal is basically derived from some systems I read about where
> the corba/distributed layer was implemented separately from the layers
> that do the actual work (the processing layer in our case). I tried to
> adapt it to the vsh setup.
I thought communication (between cores) would occur in the brokering layer.
This is what GMS was going to handle, right? If communication occurs through
the Python-based definitions layer, what is the broker layer used for? It
must be used for more than communicating with Overflow (processing layer).
> In addition, since this system would probably require a
> multithreaded server in the definition layer (to deal with possibly
> simultaneous communication with the processing layer and multiple
> remote implementations), this proposal led me to worry about using
> ORBit for all our communication.
As an aside, we will eventually need a multithreaded connection between the DL
and the front ends.
Cheers.
Jeff
--
+----------------------------------+
| J.W. Bizzaro |
| |
| http://bioinformatics.org/~jeff/ |
| |
| BIOINFORMATICS.ORG |
| The Open Lab |
| |
| http://bioinformatics.org/ |
+----------------------------------+
More information about the Pipet-Devel
mailing list