Brad Chapman wrote: > > I would personally really like to see Overflow, GMS and Loci all coming > together. For my personal use, I would really be interested in having a > mechanism for wrapping "smaller" objects than just programs. While you may > not often want to pipe these small objects over internet connections, you > may way to combine a whole bunch of local small objects, and pipe the > output to another object on a different machine. Yes! This is exactly what we could do by making Overflow an APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT NODE! Overflow even has a nice way to generate command-lines for those 'unspecified' or 'unknown' applications that we come across (we can use Overflow to give us simple connectivity). Or, hey, how about this: The plugin/wrapper needed to run a specific application under GMS can be constructed or specified using Overflow?! > This is where a > combination of all three programs really makes a lot of sense to me. > For those on the list interested in bioinformatics stuff, I'm > specifically thinking of the bioperl/biojava/biopython projects which have > a combined idl specifying a general set of functions for all three > projects. Wrapping these functions seems like something Overflow is > ideally suited to do, while GMS and Loci don't address such small data > structures. Right! > For such a powerful system as we all are proposing, we really need > to include both small and large structures, or I think we'll be sorry > later. Another 2 cents. Exactly! Gee I really like this kid :-) Jeff -- +----------------------------------+ | J.W. Bizzaro | | | | http://bioinformatics.org/~jeff/ | | | | BIOINFORMATICS.ORG | | The Open Lab | | | | http://bioinformatics.org/ | +----------------------------------+