Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > > Well, it you combine several nodes in a subnet, you end up with a "new > node" (it's in fact a subnet). You have created a new node type, but you > haven't created a new data type. Right now, there's no way to create new > data types without touching C++ code. Okay, I'm not suggesting new data types anywhere (yet) ;-) I like the way that Overflow is used to construct a command, but as outlined in the document I just posted, I would like to add some features, to make it easier for the user. Exaclty what I want to add has yet to be determined. > C analogy: you have a couple functions (nodes) and you write a new on > that calls many of the "old" functions. You end up with a new function > (node) but you did not create a new type. Got it. > I think I'll write an analogy between Overflow "concepts" and their > Matlab (or C) equivalent. That would be nice. Jeff