"J.W. Bizzaro" wrote: > > Nicolas Chauvat wrote: > > > > SOAP is slow... because parsing XML messages is slow and using a generic > > format for marshalling objects is verbose (ie much slower than Corba and > > its stub mechanism). But it works and looks like a good open-standard > > candidate. > > We don't have to choose one or the other for everything. There's nothing > wrong with: > > Local: CORBA > (UIL <--> DL <--> BL <--> PL) > > Remote: SOAP or Fipa > (BL <--> BL or DL <--> DL) > > Or is there? There always is, but very little compared to other designs. This is the setup I had in mind too. jarl