[pyorbit] pyIDL

[James Henstridge]

Alright, I made the change.

I was just reading through the IDL -> python mapping, and it looks like a
number of bits (including the DII create_request mapping) seem to require
the interface repository.  Does anyone know how far along it is at the
moment?

James.

--
Email: james at daa.com.au
WWW:   http://www.daa.com.au/~james/


On Wed, 15 Sep 1999, Michael Robinson wrote:

> James Henstridge <james at daa.com.au> writes:
> >It would probably cause problems for anything which was using the
> >resulting tuple.  We could put in a dummy value into the tuple, but it may
> >be a bit cleaner to change pyIDL a bit.  You would probably know best
> >what this change would affect.
> 
> What you need to do is decrement all the indices in the "class idl_op_dcl:"
> declaration in PyIDL.py.  That should fix everything.
> 
> 	-Michael Robinson
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pyorbit maillist  -  pyorbit at theopenlab.uml.edu
> http://theopenlab.uml.edu/mailman/listinfo/pyorbit
>