On 25 Feb 2005, at 5:43 pm, James Cuff wrote: > I think we should be a bit more proactive here. It's a real small > world. There was a mention of a 'bioclusters book' on this list a > while ago... maybe we should lead by example? I'd be happy throw in a > chapter... I'm not sure the market is big enough. And anyway, I think the principles are fairly generic. I used to think bioinformatics tasks were somehow different, and that bioinformatics clusters had different rules. The more I talk to other cluster managers around the world, the less I think that is true. There are plenty of other disciplines with similarly embarrassingly parallel, high data/cpu ratio problems, and they build clusters in the same way. > However, all I know about writing books is that takes for ever and > ever, it's really hard work, big fat personal egos get in the way of > good content, most of it is out of date by the time you finish, and in > the end no one ever seems to thank you for it. How many of us actually really learn anything from "how-to" style books? I don't. I get that stuff from the web, mailing lists, and talking to people. I generally only find O'Reilly books useful if they are a more "reference style". Tim -- Dr Tim Cutts Informatics Systems Group, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute GPG: 1024D/E3134233 FE3D 6C73 BBD6 726A A3F5 860B 3CDD 3F56 E313 4233