[BiO BB] Unix or Linux

Joel Dudley Joel.Dudley at DevelopOnline.com
Wed Nov 14 10:04:56 EST 2001

NT Server 4.0 is quite stable and does not crash at all?? On what planet???

-----Original Message-----
From: Bio Next [mailto:biologynext at yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 8:25 PM
To: bio_bulletin_board at bioinformatics.org
Subject: Re: [BiO BB] Unix or Linux


The ends must justify the means.

1. If you are prudent with budget and primarily focus on number
   crunching then use Linux ( preferably RedHat 7.1 ).
   The I/O capabilities in Linux beat the other UNices pants down
   and is even faster than Windows, though marginally.

2. If you are more interested in analysis of information in a
   visually intuitive way, invest in Windows NT ( SP 6 ) so that
   you a sophisticated and mature UI. 
   Avoid Win9X and Win2K and WinXP because they are either not
   stable or just demanding in terms of hardware requirements.
   However NT Server 4.0 is currently quite stable and doesn't
   crash at all, if you have been careful with the quality of RAM.

Let me know if you need additional quantitative data.

Hope this helps.


> On Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 09:37:46AM -0800, Peri Suraj wrote:
> > 
> > 1. UNIX ( Digital, Solaris, IRIX that are proprietory
> > and robust)
> > 2. LINUX( Free, widely used and flexible)
> > 
> > Folks, what would you prefer?

Do You Yahoo!?
Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals

BiO_Bulletin_Board maillist  -  BiO_Bulletin_Board at bioinformatics.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.bioinformatics.org/pipermail/bbb/attachments/20011114/78da32ea/attachment.html>

More information about the BBB mailing list