LAI Loong Fong wrote: > > The process in OSX 10.3 can only see up to 4GB of ram. From what I > understand, 10.4 may or may not resolve this issue. I did heard about people > buying from Apple but run YDL instead. The big issue we keep seeing in 64 linux is running into ABI differences. There are a few distributions that try to create a "pure" 64 bit or a mixed 64 bit environment, and neither do a perfect job. Usually you see this in terms of broken software installation/builds. Other times libraries are broken, or headers, or paths to the libraries/headers ... It would help if there were simple methods of tying paths to ABI's. In terms of the 4GB limit, this is an annoyance today, and I suspect for most folks, will become a major issue in short order. I think YDL is a RH variant, so hopefully it has support built in (if it was built from the 64 bit ports of RH). If not, it would be nice if OSX came in an OSX64 (if not today, then soon). I wonder if that would get compiler support though (the IBM compiler specifically). Joe > > LAI Loong-Fong > > _______________________________________________ > Bioclusters maillist - Bioclusters at bioinformatics.org > https://bioinformatics.org/mailman/listinfo/bioclusters -- Joseph Landman, Ph.D Scalable Informatics LLC, email: landman at scalableinformatics.com web : http://www.scalableinformatics.com phone: +1 734 786 8423