[Bioclusters] pipeline pilot vs. taverna?
wilfred at sdsc.edu
Fri Feb 20 16:15:15 EST 2009
It seems that if your users are already using Accelrys tools, pipeline
pilot would be a better choice, and the support you may receive. Mostly
depends on your budget. PP also support web services, like Taverna.
From: bioclusters-bounces at bioinformatics.org
[mailto:bioclusters-bounces at bioinformatics.org] On Behalf Of Hershel
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 7:01 AM
To: bioclusters at bioinformatics.org
Subject: [Bioclusters] pipeline pilot vs. taverna?
Without meaning to incite any flame wars, I would like to ask about the
relative advantages of Pipeline Pilot and Taverna.
To be more specific, I am joining a startup drug-discovery company,
will use a combination of computational and wet-lab chemistry. The
computational chemists will use a lot of Accelrys tools, as well as
from other vendors. We are looking for a tool to automate computational
workflows, and the leading candidates seem to be Pipeline Pilot and
>From your experience, what are the strengths of the two tools? Does
Pilot operate better with the Accelrys tools because they're from the
Bioclusters maillist - Bioclusters at bioinformatics.org
More information about the Bioclusters